• yourjizzx cum
  • Current Issues

    On May 13, 2009 House Representative Barb Byrum along with several other Representatives proposed HB 4890 and HB 4891 which both deal with prohibiting STOLI (stranger originated life insurance). The basic issue of this legislation is if individuals with life insurance should have the option to sell their policy to a third party so they can access their money that was likely not going to be used for insurance purposes. Such transactions are known as "viatical settlement transactions". "The viatical settlement transaction uses an insurance product to be sold in a secondary market as the financial instrument on which the investment is based." (Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation OFIR) As today's economic times toughen it seems that more and more people are using the viatical settlement market to get cash when their life insurance policy is becoming less useful due to nonpayment of premiums.

    The legislation is specifically concerned with whether this STOLI transaction is undermining the purpose and service that life insurance intends to provide its clients. HB 4890 and 4891 prohibits STOLI transactions. It also provides several "consumer protections" such as fingerprinting and background checks for applicants, and "administrative enforcement, preserves private cause of action to viator and provides for civil penalties and restitution." (OFIR)

    Arguments in support of legislation:
    This legislation adds regulatory framework for viatical settlement transactions and contains consumer protections. Supporters also argue that requiring financing report to the Office of Financial Insurance Regulation provides transparency on these transactions which consequently better serves both the individual client and tax payers alike. It also provides grounds for punishing those who engage in fraudulent conduct.

     

    .

     

    Arguments against legislation
    This legislation is a violation of consumer rights some argue. Since most policies do not result in any claim, the owner of the policy ends up losing the money at their death. However, the policy may have a much greater value in the secondary market. In today's tough economic times, consumers should be able to cash in their policy if they need/want to. In an opposing argument provided by Dough Head, Executive Director of the Life Insurance Settlement Association he takes an analogy using tickets to a sports game. "People sell tickets to big games in the secondary market only when they can't attend or don't care about the game, not when they want to go". Other critiques of the legislation include that the language is too archaic and that instead of preventing STOLI the bill actually just slows the settlement industry.

    It seems that both sides of the fence are against STOLI but unsure of how to regulate the secondary market, who the third party is and what rules should be applied to such transactions. This bill has now been referred to the Committee on Economic Development and Regulatory Reform for further discussion.

     

    Sources:

    5/14/09 Doug Head -Life Insurance Settlement Association HB 4890 in Opposition to the bill. This is four pages long and has 16 pages of attachments- a court ruling etc.

    The Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation Supports this Legislation Ken Ross and Jenita Moore 5/14/09

    Home
    Agriculture
    Policy Briefs
    Current Issues
    National Context
    Interviews
    Blog
    Most Popular Posts
    Timeline
    Commerce & Regulation
    Policy Briefs
    Current Issues
    National Context
    Interviews
    Blog
    Most Popular Posts
    Timeline
    Criminal Justice
    Policy Briefs
    Current Issues
    National Context
    Interviews
    Blog
    Most Popular Posts
    In The Courts
    Timeline
    Employment
    Policy Briefs
    Current Issues
    National Context
    Interviews
    Blog
    Most Popular Posts
    Timeline
    Great Lakes & Recreation
    Policy Briefs
    Current Issues
    National Context
    Interviews
    Blog
    Most Popular Posts
    Timeline
    Energy and Environment
    Policy Briefs
    Current Issues
    National Context
    Interviews
    Blog
    Most Popular Posts
    Timeline
    Health Care
    Policy Briefs
    Current Issues
    National Context
    Interviews
    Blog
    Most Popular Posts
    Timeline
    K-12 Education
    Policy Briefs
    Current Issues
    National Context
    Interviews
    Blog
    Most Popular Posts
    Timeline
    Morality and Family
    Policy Briefs
    Current Issues
    National Context
    Interviews
    Blog
    Most Popular Posts
    Timeline
    Political Reform
    Policy Briefs
    Current Issues
    National Context
    Interviews
    Blog
    Most Popular Posts
    Timeline
    Social Services & Seniors
    Policy Briefs
    Current Issues
    National Context
    Interviews
    Blog
    Most Popular Posts
    Timeline
    State Budget
    Policy Briefs
    Current Issues
    National Context
    Interviews
    Blog
    Most Popular Posts
    Timeline
    Taxes
    Policy Briefs
    Current Issues
    National Context
    Interviews
    Blog
    Most Popular Posts
    Timeline
    Transportation
    Policy Briefs
    Current Issues
    National Context
    Interviews
    Blog
    Most Popular Posts
    Timeline
    Urban Affairs
    Policy Briefs
    Current Issues
    National Context
    Interviews
    Blog
    Most Popular Posts
    Timeline

    About Us

    The Michigan Policy Network is a student-led public education and research program to report and organize news and information about the political process surrounding Michigan state policy issues. It is run out of the Department of Political Science at Michigan State University, with participation by students from the College of Social Science, the College of Communication, and James Madison College. 

    Read more about us...

    Sponsors

    Michigan State University    Department of Political Science 
     College of Communication Arts & Sciences    James Madison College
     College of Social Science    University Outreach and Engagement

     

    The thoughts, opinions, and positions represented herein are solely those of the participating students and in no way represent an official position or policy recommendation of Michigan State University.

    Our sponsors...

    Policy Fellow: Marie Hallberg

    Marie Hallberg is the commerce & regulation correspondent for the Michigan Policy Network and a first-year student at Michigan State University. Currently, she is a no preference major, but is interested in either a teaching or communications degree. Marie is very excited to be attending MSU and anxious to explore the opportunities that are available to her. Marie is originally from Illinois and enjoys hanging out with her family and friends, reading, and being in band. Her career aspirations include a job focused on serving and working with people, possibly in the guest service area. She is very interested in using her experience on the Michigan Policy Network to help better her understanding of the Michigan government and how its policies ultimately affect the citizens of Michigan.